Small Mercies by Dennis Lehane
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Lehane at his best. Boston noir: nuanced, real characters; trying to get by in a corrupted and imperfect world. Mary Pat is a fascinating character. She's a classic anti-hero. She's not conventionally heroic, her motives are not necessarily pure but she does what has to be done. She struggles to make sense of the situation in which she finds herself, but doesn't foreswore her own responsibility for it. She's also a bad ass.
The setting of the story is also interesting. In some ways it seems incidental to the main plot. But besides giving heighten tension (and disquiet at the overt racism of the time), the issue of busing is another instance of what I think is one of the main leitmotifs of the book. Parents wanting what is best (or what they think is best) for their children: trying to give them what they think they need. Another related motif is that in many cases what the parents are doing is actually harmful for their children. Nearly every character is a parent and struggles with doing what is best for their kids -- even though many fail miserably at it. That's part of the tragic element here: most parents love their kids and want what is best for them; but often we don't know what that is or how to give it to them. And as one character muses: we can't keep them safe. We can teach them, we can love them, we can do our best, but we ultimately can't keep them safe.
View all my reviews
Tuesday, October 29, 2024
Wednesday, October 23, 2024
Review: Retrieving Aristotle in an Age of Crisis
Retrieving Aristotle in an Age of Crisis by David Roochnik
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This is rich and profound work of philosophy. Roochnik in just over 200 pages is able to explain and defend Aristotle in a modern context. From the title, I expected more of a direct analysis of how Aristotle's ideas might be used as a way to help navigate and even cure our 'Age of Crisis,' The book, however, is far more an explication and articulation of Aristotle's entire philosophic system. Obviously Roochnik does not got into great detail or dive into every puzzle and paradox of Aristotelian thought. But he is able to present the system, the world-view of Aristotle, from his metaphysics to his ethics to his politics. In this way it is immensely helpful and important. And further, it is this analysis of the Aristotelian world-view that Roochnik does, usually indirectly, use as a way of navigating our current age.
Roochnik also provides a defense, at times a limited and circumspect defense, of Aristotle's philosophical arguments and claims against modern critiques. By casting Aristotle's thought as fundamentally about 'saving the phenomena," Roochnik is able to show that some of these critiques miss the point or fail to hit their mark because they don't actually see what Aristotle is doing. Aristotle stars with the human experience of the human world and moves out from there to explain and understand, never losing that foundation or context.
I found the book fascinating, a joy (but challenge) to read, and insightful. Much like his Beautiful City: The Dialectical Character of Plato's "Republic", I found it illuminating and helpful for my teaching and my own understand of these great thinkers.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This is rich and profound work of philosophy. Roochnik in just over 200 pages is able to explain and defend Aristotle in a modern context. From the title, I expected more of a direct analysis of how Aristotle's ideas might be used as a way to help navigate and even cure our 'Age of Crisis,' The book, however, is far more an explication and articulation of Aristotle's entire philosophic system. Obviously Roochnik does not got into great detail or dive into every puzzle and paradox of Aristotelian thought. But he is able to present the system, the world-view of Aristotle, from his metaphysics to his ethics to his politics. In this way it is immensely helpful and important. And further, it is this analysis of the Aristotelian world-view that Roochnik does, usually indirectly, use as a way of navigating our current age.
Roochnik also provides a defense, at times a limited and circumspect defense, of Aristotle's philosophical arguments and claims against modern critiques. By casting Aristotle's thought as fundamentally about 'saving the phenomena," Roochnik is able to show that some of these critiques miss the point or fail to hit their mark because they don't actually see what Aristotle is doing. Aristotle stars with the human experience of the human world and moves out from there to explain and understand, never losing that foundation or context.
I found the book fascinating, a joy (but challenge) to read, and insightful. Much like his Beautiful City: The Dialectical Character of Plato's "Republic", I found it illuminating and helpful for my teaching and my own understand of these great thinkers.
View all my reviews
Thursday, October 17, 2024
Review: The End of Race Politics: Arguments for a Colorblind America
The End of Race Politics: Arguments for a Colorblind America by Coleman Hughes
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
As a follower of Hughes work, there was not a lot new here but it was great to have it laid out and presented in one spot with an integrated throughline. In this short volume, Hughes presents the history of the civil rights movement and its colorblind (race-neutral) approach. He then shows how the new so-called anti-racist thinkers are actually quite racist; dubbing them neoracists. These are the likes of Kendi, DiAngelo, Hannah-Jones, and Coates. They peddle ideas about race that are wrong, not rooted in reality or data, and harmful to the goals of more equality. He shows how inconsistent and contrary their ideas are to the civil rights movement, and Dr. King in particular. Hughes also discusses better, more effective ways to think about race, and how to work towards more equality.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
As a follower of Hughes work, there was not a lot new here but it was great to have it laid out and presented in one spot with an integrated throughline. In this short volume, Hughes presents the history of the civil rights movement and its colorblind (race-neutral) approach. He then shows how the new so-called anti-racist thinkers are actually quite racist; dubbing them neoracists. These are the likes of Kendi, DiAngelo, Hannah-Jones, and Coates. They peddle ideas about race that are wrong, not rooted in reality or data, and harmful to the goals of more equality. He shows how inconsistent and contrary their ideas are to the civil rights movement, and Dr. King in particular. Hughes also discusses better, more effective ways to think about race, and how to work towards more equality.
View all my reviews
Review: The Dead Sister
The Dead Sister by Jonathan Dunsky
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This fast-paced, action-packed hard-boiled detective novel is set in Israel in 1949. Lapid is hired to solve the murder of a young Arab woman not too long after the end of Israel's war of independence. This provides for some interesting drama. Lapid is a classic hard-boiled detective. He has strict code and sense of justice; though it is not always aligned with the conventional sense of morality and justice. Though there are strong forces lined up against him, Lapid won't back down from seeing that justice is done. Highly recommended!
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This fast-paced, action-packed hard-boiled detective novel is set in Israel in 1949. Lapid is hired to solve the murder of a young Arab woman not too long after the end of Israel's war of independence. This provides for some interesting drama. Lapid is a classic hard-boiled detective. He has strict code and sense of justice; though it is not always aligned with the conventional sense of morality and justice. Though there are strong forces lined up against him, Lapid won't back down from seeing that justice is done. Highly recommended!
View all my reviews
Friday, October 11, 2024
Review: Masterpieces: The Best Science Fiction of the Twentieth Century
Masterpieces: The Best Science Fiction of the Twentieth Century by Orson Scott Card
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A great collection; it covers a wider variety of the history and breadth of styles of 2oth century science fiction. I enjoyed nearly all the stories; some were excellent. I would have liked a bit more context for the stories themselves -- at least some sense of why Card chose these particular stories. Was it just that the story tickled him? Was it influential? Did it have some impact on the field or the author? Card provides a short bio of the author, but I would have liked more on the story itself and the why of its inclusion.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A great collection; it covers a wider variety of the history and breadth of styles of 2oth century science fiction. I enjoyed nearly all the stories; some were excellent. I would have liked a bit more context for the stories themselves -- at least some sense of why Card chose these particular stories. Was it just that the story tickled him? Was it influential? Did it have some impact on the field or the author? Card provides a short bio of the author, but I would have liked more on the story itself and the why of its inclusion.
View all my reviews
Review: Robert B. Parker's Blind Spot
Robert B. Parker's Blind Spot by Reed Farrel Coleman
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Coleman brings a bit of the hard-boiled style to Parker's Stone. The writing style and depth is better than Brandman's and Coleman definitely brings his own interpretation to the characters. Brandman was doing an imitation, a cover of the classics if you will. Coleman is more taking Parker's creation and doing an interpretation. He's not trying to imitate Parker or produce something that might fool someone into thinking it was Parker. Instead he's keep the themes and core melody, but adding elements that are more his own. Some people obviously don't like that; but I think it works. There are elements that are not quite right -- the main one being Stone's heavier drinking. I don't have a problem with Stone drinking more again, but I think Coleman might have provided some context for that and built towards. And while Coleman's Stone is not as witty nor does the dialogue have quite the same pop as Parker (who's could?!); Coleman does a good job of getting the essence of it right.
The story itself is more interesting and compelling than Brandman's novellas. This twice as long as Brandman's and so the story has time to develop and reach a conclusion. I like the fleshing out of some Stone's baseball background and how that ties into the present. That feels like a nice connection to Parker's writing as well.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Coleman brings a bit of the hard-boiled style to Parker's Stone. The writing style and depth is better than Brandman's and Coleman definitely brings his own interpretation to the characters. Brandman was doing an imitation, a cover of the classics if you will. Coleman is more taking Parker's creation and doing an interpretation. He's not trying to imitate Parker or produce something that might fool someone into thinking it was Parker. Instead he's keep the themes and core melody, but adding elements that are more his own. Some people obviously don't like that; but I think it works. There are elements that are not quite right -- the main one being Stone's heavier drinking. I don't have a problem with Stone drinking more again, but I think Coleman might have provided some context for that and built towards. And while Coleman's Stone is not as witty nor does the dialogue have quite the same pop as Parker (who's could?!); Coleman does a good job of getting the essence of it right.
The story itself is more interesting and compelling than Brandman's novellas. This twice as long as Brandman's and so the story has time to develop and reach a conclusion. I like the fleshing out of some Stone's baseball background and how that ties into the present. That feels like a nice connection to Parker's writing as well.
View all my reviews
Sunday, October 06, 2024
Review: Robert B. Parker's Damned If You Do: A Jesse Stone Novel
Robert B. Parker's Damned If You Do: A Jesse Stone Novel by Michael Brandman
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Of the three Brandman Jesse Stone novels, I think this one was the best. It still had several of the flaws that the first two had, but I think Brandman was starting to get more of a feel for it. There were more Parker-esque type characters, set ups, and resolutions. There were a few things that were off, but the story was also tighter than the previous two.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Of the three Brandman Jesse Stone novels, I think this one was the best. It still had several of the flaws that the first two had, but I think Brandman was starting to get more of a feel for it. There were more Parker-esque type characters, set ups, and resolutions. There were a few things that were off, but the story was also tighter than the previous two.
View all my reviews
Review: Robert B. Parker's Fool Me Twice
Robert B. Parker's Fool Me Twice by Michael Brandman
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Like the first Brandman Stone novel, this has the feel of the Jesse Stone tv show. The Jesse Stone character is well sketched, but we don't get as much of the inner life of the character. The supporting cast like Molly and Suits are fun but thin. The resolution of the plot lines is rather quickly, without much fuss, and unsatisfying in its obviousness. Nevertheless, I do enjoy being in the world Parker created and left us.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Like the first Brandman Stone novel, this has the feel of the Jesse Stone tv show. The Jesse Stone character is well sketched, but we don't get as much of the inner life of the character. The supporting cast like Molly and Suits are fun but thin. The resolution of the plot lines is rather quickly, without much fuss, and unsatisfying in its obviousness. Nevertheless, I do enjoy being in the world Parker created and left us.
View all my reviews
Saturday, October 05, 2024
Review: End Game
End Game by David Baldacci
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Exciting and fast paced, Baldacci delivers. Robie and Reel team up and solve Blue Man's disappearance. As usual, they leave a lot of bad guy bodies in their wake.
Reading performance is top notched. I'm glad they have two narrators; it helps to distinguish the characters.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Exciting and fast paced, Baldacci delivers. Robie and Reel team up and solve Blue Man's disappearance. As usual, they leave a lot of bad guy bodies in their wake.
Reading performance is top notched. I'm glad they have two narrators; it helps to distinguish the characters.
View all my reviews
Friday, October 04, 2024
Review: The October 7 War: Israel's Battle for Security in Gaza
The October 7 War: Israel's Battle for Security in Gaza by Seth J. Frantzman
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
An important book insofar as it provides an important journalistic record of the first six months or so of the October 7 war. Frantzman condenses his interviews with many IDF soldiers, former hostages, and Israelis that survived that October 7 attack. These accounts are important to have on record.
Being published as quickly as it was, there are bound to be errors: both of fact and of grammar. The writing itself at times was a bit a staccato, sometimes repetitive, and the timeline wasn't always as clear as I would have liked. I think these were largely signs of the book being rushed to be published.
One of the things I most interesting in the book were the accounts of the new technologies and fighting tactics enabled by the former. Over the 6 months of fighting in Gaza, the IDF learned on the go to fight in new ways and with new technology. Frantzman does a good job of describing this.
The bigger picture analysis was probably the weakest part. That wasn't really the point of the book and in many ways it was too early in the process to get too much into that.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
An important book insofar as it provides an important journalistic record of the first six months or so of the October 7 war. Frantzman condenses his interviews with many IDF soldiers, former hostages, and Israelis that survived that October 7 attack. These accounts are important to have on record.
Being published as quickly as it was, there are bound to be errors: both of fact and of grammar. The writing itself at times was a bit a staccato, sometimes repetitive, and the timeline wasn't always as clear as I would have liked. I think these were largely signs of the book being rushed to be published.
One of the things I most interesting in the book were the accounts of the new technologies and fighting tactics enabled by the former. Over the 6 months of fighting in Gaza, the IDF learned on the go to fight in new ways and with new technology. Frantzman does a good job of describing this.
The bigger picture analysis was probably the weakest part. That wasn't really the point of the book and in many ways it was too early in the process to get too much into that.
View all my reviews
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)